“Binary alternative is completely different. That’s as much as the father or mother. Which means we wouldn’t be separating anyone. The father or mother makes that call,” a senior administration official stated. | Cedar Attanasio/AP Picture
The “binary alternative” presents mother and father with a stark choice: Keep detained with their youngsters or launch them right into a authorities shelter.
On Tuesday, President Donald Trump stated his administration has no intention of separating migrant youngsters from their mother and father.
However two senior administration officers on Wednesday appeared to contradict the president, saying the federal authorities is certainly weighing a coverage that might have the identical final impact.
Story Continued Beneath
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is at the moment “analyzing the worth and efficacy” of a brand new program that, if carried out, would once more result in the separation of immigrant households after they’ve been apprehended on the border, the primary senior administration official stated.
The “binary alternative” coverage, because it’s being referred to in inner discussions, goals to discourage unlawful immigration by presenting migrant mother and father who’re caught crossing the border illegally with a stark choice: They’ll stay detained with their youngsters indefinitely whereas they await a ultimate elimination order, or they’ll launch their youngsters right into a separate authorities shelter the place different kin may take custody of them.
By signing up you conform to obtain e mail newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You may unsubscribe at any time.
The senior administration official made a distinction between this binary alternative choice and the administration’s prior apply of forcefully separating migrant youth from their mother and father on the border.
“Binary alternative is completely different. That’s as much as the father or mother. Which means we wouldn’t be separating anyone. The father or mother makes that call,” the official stated.
A second senior administration official confirmed the dialogue, however stated that officers in command of immigration coverage “presume comparatively few folks would select” the latter choice, through which mother and father would await their elimination order whereas in separate custody from their youngsters.
The identical official stated the coverage proposal “has not but been dropped at the White Home for consideration for implementation” as a result of ICE is grappling with “critical useful resource constraints” that might hamper its effectiveness.
The officers have been searching for to clarify why, in an Oval Workplace assembly with the Egyptian president on Tuesday, Trump repeatedly advised reporters he had no intention of returning to the apply of separating migrant households.
“We’re not trying to do this, no. We’re not trying to do this,” the president stated.
Ousted Homeland Safety Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen had pushed again in opposition to efforts throughout the administration in current weeks to reinstate household separations, based on two sources near the company.
The earlier coverage that resulted in household separations, often called “zero tolerance,” turned a public relations catastrophe for the White Home heading into the midterm elections final summer season — congressional Republicans swiftly distanced themselves from the administration — and Nielsen argued it might be no completely different this time round.
However with Nielsen leaving the administration this week, together with different high DHS officers, the president is bristling at ideas that anybody else is in command of his administration’s immigration agenda.
In remarks to reporters on Wednesday morning, Trump stated, “Frankly, there’s just one particular person that’s operating it. You realize who that’s? It’s me.”
This text tagged beneath:
Lacking out on the newest scoops? Join POLITICO Playbook and get the newest information, each morning — in your inbox.